Adam and Eve: The First Egalitarians?

March 14, 2008

“Eve was not taken out of Adam’s head to top him, neither out of his feet to be trampled on by him, but out of his side to be equal with him, under his arm to be protected by him, and near his heart to be loved by him.”–Matthew Henry

Since a Christian woman’s identity and function are irreversibly intertwined with the idea of gender roles, we must examine what gender roles are: what do they entail? Do they enforce limitations? Are they all-time binding? What was God’s original intent for the sexes?
To adequately examine biblical gender roles, we must take a holistic look at scripture and start at the very beginning. So, what do Adam and Eve tell us about gender roles? Well, I’m glad you asked. :)
Genesis is a fascinating book for many reasons, but the tale of the first man and woman is especially telling. The Creation account portrays the ideal purpose and function of man and woman. Unfortunately, Adam and Eve’s failure overshadows their brief time living in God’s ideal–in perfect unity and harmony with Him, each other, and all of creation. As a result, we glorify the altered relationship between man and woman that came as a result of the fall and hold it up as God’s ordained model. One of the greatest misconceptions about the creation account is that a divine gender hierarchy which places women “under” men was seamlessly instituted from the moment Eve was created. This is simply not so.
The Fall instituted a plethora of consequences—a deteriorating creation, death, separation from God, rampant sin, and the dominance of men over women (“a man will rule over his wife…”). Since this ugly change is part of the curse, we must conclude that male domination or gender hierarchy was NOT part of God’s original plan and did not exist between Adam and Eve prior to the fall, since it is an explicitly new development existing because of sin. The Good News of the Gospel is that Christ, the second Adam, came and died to restore all of us, men and women alike, to God’s original design.
Biblical Scholar Phyllis Trible notes that:
“The Fall created an inequality in the family relationship that had not existed before. And if Christ has become a curse for us (Gal. 3:13), then that curse of inequality is undone in Him.”

God reveals the terms of His ideal plan in Genesis 1: 26-28. Keep in mind that the word “man” here is not synonymous with male, but mankind and humanity.

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”

Notice that God commands BOTH Adam and Eve to rule the earth and over all creation. God didn’t say, “Adam, you are to rule and Eve, well, you can go do some dishes, maybe fold a little laundry…” They were both called to rule, complementing each other, supporting each other, serving each other, sacrificing for the other, and deferring to each other.

Alas, sin stripped humans of this inheritance. The implications of the fall, that mankind would be stuck with a sinful nature, indicates the stronger would inevitably exploit and dominate the weaker and more vulnerable. This is not exclusive to gender, but hierarchies also developed between races, the wealthy and poor, the powerful and the weak, and so forth. When God declares that “a man will rule over his wife,” in Genesis 3:16, it’s important to make the distinction between description and prescription, between what will happen and what should happen. All sorts of horrible consequences came about because of the fall: death, separation from God, murder, rape, incest, oppression, abuse, perversion, etc. None of these are God-ordained, but the unfortunate consequence of free will (sorry Calvinists!). And all of which, Christ came to redeem. He bore the curse of the fall, took it upon himself to free us from lives of sin and restore humanity to God’s original design, a relationship with our Creator and spiritual equality among His people. We won’t come fully into that until Christ returns, but it begins now.

John Temple Bristow, a new testament scholar, elaborates on the realities of the Fall:

If this kind of marital relationship, far from being divinely ordered, is the product of sin and the curse, then it is to be avoided rather than commended. It is characteristic of marriage outside of God’s grace. To prescribe this kind of relationship is to advocate living under the penalty of sin imposed upon Adam and Eve, as if Christ brought nothing new to marriage relationships.”

Part of the redemption we find in Jesus is “the great reconciliation.” Our spiritual place has been restored with God and each other. Just as we are no longer alienated from God through Jesus’ death on the cross, we are no longer under the curse that creates the dysfunctional hierarchies between races, socio-economic classes, and the sexes. Yet, we are hesitant to claim and live out humanity’s original calling that Christ paved the way back to.

Redemption is a multidimensional, beautiful truth of the gospel that invades every area of our lives.

Next post: “Eve, The Help Meet,” which will explore who Eve is and why she was created.

7 Responses to “Adam and Eve: The First Egalitarians?”

  1. linda Says:

    another interesting thing i’ve read is that when adam told God why he ate of the fruit he was not actually blaming eve but just stating things as they happened–that the woman that God put there with him, eve, gave him of the fruit and he ate it. i believe this is correct and that we have read into the text adam blaming eve for his sin. there is no doubt that eve was deceived or messed up but i don’t think we can assume that adam was blaming eve as we’ve probably all been taught.

  2. Tia Lynn Says:

    That is interesting! And probably true.

  3. Tina Says:

    Eve as Adam was given Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”
    Not within the home or the church. There has to be order and if you have two people ruling at the same time, you will have chaos. Yes Eve is not lesser than Adam in any way,But int he kingdom of God there is order.

  4. Tia Lynn Says:

    Within the church and marriage, neither sex should be focused on ruling, but submitting to each other, cooperating with each other, and serving each other. That’s the true order in the kingdom of God. We partner with each other, esteem others higher than ourselves, and seek God’s guidance, submitting to His leadership. :)

  5. Bethany Says:

    Thank you for posting this! We, as Christians, need to speak the truth, in love, instead of encouraging the curse like so many generations before us! Christ’s redemptive power is at work and we need to LIVE it!

  6. Stephen Wright Says:

    I disagree, because the apostles saw husband headship from a very different angle. Listen to what Paul says in Ephesians 5:22-24: “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let wives be to their own husbands in every thing.” Now you might readily conclude that the reason for this command is culture-based or circumstantial, and does not really apply now since it was a part of the Curse anyway, but Paul doesn’t stop with “this is so:” he says it is so because “…the husband is head of the wife as Christ is head of the church…” giving a basis for it, and supplying the immortal image of the husband and wife as a reflection of Christ and the church, which is an awesomely eternal, good, and beautiful picture that Time just can’t beat, curse or no curse! (Go on to read the husband’s side of the duties, which are much different from the wife’s. And this is not the only place in the New Testament that talks about wifely submission). Thus unless the apostles contradict the implications of the Fall, we are left with few choices: either we can assume that (1) this kind of authority existed before the Fall, and the Curse introduced a negative kind of authority, (2) the curse has not really been done away with, or (3) that things are changing and not going back to the way they were in the beginning. Those are the only logical explanations I can think of, and personally I find the first one to be the least farfetched.

    Perhaps you can’t accept the headship of a male, but let me make something clear: with authority does not come superiority, as the world tells you. That’s how worldly authority works. But what the passage in Ephesians is talking about is not political authority, but Biblical authority: not laid down for the exaltation of the man over the woman, or to give him tyrannical power, but for the sake of the woman, to shelter and protect her, as well as take a load of unnecessary responsibility off her back (a wife and mother has so much to handle already); this is not to take away her freedom, or inhibit her talents and gifts, but to encourage her respect for the man as he is the first among equals, and to preserve the male and female distinctions that God installed to make things more colorful; to give Adam his sense of purpose as being created male, which he would be stripped of if Eve claimed the masculine role as well as the feminine (in which case she would strip herself of her own significance as being created solely female). It is important here also that you make the distinction between good-willed men and evil-willed men, the latter of whom does not deserve the role he abuses, but does not characterize every man alive (and even if a wife did have an evil-willed husband she could possibly win him over by following the instructions in 1 Peter 3:1-6).

    I could go on, but I think this is all I will say right now. Sorry my comment is so long, but I thought you should hear the other side of the argument.

    Anyway, God bless you.

    • Wren Says:

      Eph 5:21 Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.

      And Eph 5:28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church— 30 for we are members of his body. 31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”[c] 32 This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92 other followers