labels, the f-word, and splitting hairs

April 26, 2009

awhile back makeesha had an excellent post on her blog about feminism and the chaos of labels. something she said has stuck with me all this time. she said:

One thing to keep in mind is that labels are self identifiers, they’re really not intended for us to place on others – they’re for others to place on themselves. In other words, they’re not supposed to be used as a way to judge others or put others in a box based on OUR understanding of that label.

i am reminded of her admonition when i identify myself as a “christian feminist”. christian feminism, as i see it, is a far cry from feminism. all one has to do is look at the wiki on feminism and see the numerous types of feminism there are to know that we are only one specific type of feminism rooted in christian thought. where we agree with the other types of feminism i rejoice and where we disagree i hope to extend grace.

the problem i’ve run into is that the f-word–feminism–is highly controversial. many years ago when i was in college one of my friends asked if i would help her with something. i’m not sure if it was a class assignment or what but i agreed. what we did was go around and informally ask people we knew in our dorm what they thought of the word “feminism”. the results were overwhelmingly negative and i remember internally thinking that i’d never claim to be a “feminist” as i didn’t want that negative baggage attached to me. well, now it’s 20+ years later and in some ways things haven’t changed much, especially in some church circles.

what i’ve found is when people are engaging in all-or-nothing thinking and  i say i am a “christian feminist” all they hear is “feminist” and i subsequently get pigeonholed into a box in which i most definitely do not fit that is at odds with their belief system and values. maybe i should be more courageous and be willing to say i’m a feminist, but i see christian feminism as being quite different from the secular liberal feminism that many disdain. further, i find it quite disturbing when i see christians unable or unwilling, whichever the case may be, to think in more nuanced terms.

sadly, i’ve seen too many christians swing from one extreme of christianity to another not realizing those are not the only options. usually this is a swing from christian fundamentalism to liberal christianity or vice versa. a psychiatric nurse told me that in psychology there is even a term for this sort of thinking. it is called splitting because the person is unable to view life in a more balanced or moderate fashion but splits everything up into black and white categories, good vs. bad, all or nothing. this is not to say that sometimes things aren’t good vs. bad but i believe it may not be as often as some would have us believe.

as this world we live in is changing many of us have left behind those limiting categories of either/or and moved on to seeing things in a more complex fashion. some associate this with postmodernism with it’s bothand thinking. i know some people think it’s not possible to be a “christian feminist” as “christian” is usually associated with conservatism and “feminism” with liberalism. thankfully, we are moving into an era where the reductionist thinking of modernity, which has a tendency to isolate and marginalize one as the Other, is being replaced by a more generous, complex, and inclusive way of thinking in postmodernity.

5 Responses to “labels, the f-word, and splitting hairs”

  1. Diana S Says:

    THANK YOU! I consider myself to be a “Christian feminist,” too! What are your thoughts on movies and other types of media and entertainment that objecify women? I see this as offensive, but what I find most feminists getting upset over is not how women are portrayed-such as nudity- but they seem to be more concerned over whether or not women have “power” and aren’t dominated by men. I think this is extremely important, too, but I think that when women are portrayed as sex objects, this fuels the fire, so to speak, for men to continue being sexist or have sexist tendencies. Does this make sense or am I just confusing you?

  2. linda Says:

    diana, i think you’re making perfect sense. exploitation, whether it is by men, or even women themselves, is still exploitation. julie clawson had a post on her blog how recently book covers are featuring women whose bodies are shown but the images are cut off at the head so they are further depersonalized. women being portrayed just as parts or sex objects is certainly disturbing. i couldn’t find her post but if julie sees this hopefully she’ll link to it. and don’t get me started on how public breast feeding, even when done modestly, is supposedly so objectionable, especially in christian circles. i was quite surprised to find this causes such controversy.

  3. Robyn Says:

    I am a Christian. I am a feminist. I don’t see anything contradictory about that. And I don’t mind telling people so, either. Though I get attacked quite a bit by the Republicans at my church. LOL.

    Maybe I need a different church. But I really like my “life group” people…


  4. I hear you – I have been judged to the extreme for my egalitarian views and then using the “f” word can be a guaranteed tar and feathering (or maybe burned at the stake as a witch?). Yet, I am finding more and more people who don’t see Christianity and feminism as polar opposites, rather perhaps the former actually begs the latter! Anyway, freedom is another “f’ word that is coming our way. I appreciate all of you. :-)

  5. brambonius Says:

    I’ve used the term ‘christian feminist’ for myself (and I’m even a man) and I don’t see any reason why that should be a shock to anyone… Compared to Mark Driscoll & Co Jesus was a feminist!


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92 other followers